Kimi K3 2.8T · Performance per Dollar

Kimi K3 2.8T — MI355X vs Vera Rubin NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) versus Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on Kimi K3 2.8T. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

At 121 tok/s/user on Kimi K3 2.8T, MI355X costs $0.12 per million tokens; Vera Rubin NVL72 costs $0.02. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 374% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

Vera Rubin NVL72 edges MI355X at 140 tok/s/user on Kimi K3 2.8T — $0.03 per million tokens versus $0.24, a 788% cost-per-token gap.

Push Kimi K3 2.8T to 159 tok/s/user and MI355X lands at $0.25 per million tokens against Vera Rubin NVL72's $0.03 — Vera Rubin NVL72 pulls ahead by 730%. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): MI355X $1.50/chip/hr · Vera Rubin NVL72 $3.61/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Kimi K3 2.8T: MI355X versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
MI355X versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
MI355X:$0.116Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.024
MI355X:$0.239Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.027
MI355X:$0.246Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.030
Concurrency
MI355X:~9Vera Rubin NVL72:~229
MI355X:~11Vera Rubin NVL72:~202
MI355X:~7Vera Rubin NVL72:~176

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.