Kimi K3 2.8T · Performance per Dollar

Kimi K3 2.8T — GB200 NVL72 vs GB300 NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on Kimi K3 2.8T. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX

GB300 NVL72 edges GB200 NVL72 at 56 tok/s/user on Kimi K3 2.8T — $0.05 per million tokens versus $0.12, a 134% cost-per-token gap.

Push Kimi K3 2.8T to 103 tok/s/user and GB200 NVL72 lands at $0.24 per million tokens against GB300 NVL72's $0.08 — GB300 NVL72 pulls ahead by 188%.

GB200 NVL72: $0.41 per million tokens. GB300 NVL72: $0.11. Both at 150 tok/s/user on Kimi K3 2.8T, with GB300 NVL72 262% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): GB200 NVL72 $1.86/chip/hr · GB300 NVL72 $2.31/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Kimi K3 2.8T: GB200 NVL72 versus GB300 NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
GB200 NVL72 versus GB300 NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
GB200 NVL72:$0.125GB300 NVL72:$0.053
GB200 NVL72:$0.238GB300 NVL72:$0.083
GB200 NVL72:$0.414GB300 NVL72:$0.114
Concurrency
GB200 NVL72:~16GB300 NVL72:~48
GB200 NVL72:~8GB300 NVL72:~32
GB200 NVL72:~3GB300 NVL72:~27

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.