Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T · Performance per Dollar

Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T — B200 vs Jalapeño Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus Jalapeño (OpenAI Jalapeño) on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Jalapeño edges B200 at 91 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T — $0.03 per million tokens versus $0.28, a 791% cost-per-token gap.

Push Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T to 122 tok/s/user and B200 lands at $0.48 per million tokens against Jalapeño's $0.04 — Jalapeño pulls ahead by 1216%.

B200: $0.95 per million tokens. Jalapeño: $0.05. Both at 153 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T, with Jalapeño 1961% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.73/chip/hr · Jalapeño $1.27/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T: B200 versus Jalapeño cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus Jalapeño cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.275Jalapeño:$0.031
B200:$0.479Jalapeño:$0.036
B200:$0.953Jalapeño:$0.046
Concurrency
B200:~62Jalapeño:~1062
B200:~7Jalapeño:~573
B200:~18Jalapeño:~304