gpt-oss 120B · Performance per Dollar

gpt-oss 120B — Jalapeño vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of Jalapeño (OpenAI Jalapeño) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on gpt-oss 120B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

At 149 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B, Jalapeño costs $0.01 per million tokens; MI355X costs $0.03. Jalapeño is 324% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

Jalapeño edges MI355X at 201 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B — $0.01 per million tokens versus $0.04, a 498% cost-per-token gap.

Push gpt-oss 120B to 253 tok/s/user and Jalapeño lands at $0.01 per million tokens against MI355X's $0.12 — Jalapeño pulls ahead by 1555%. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): Jalapeño $1.27/chip/hr · MI355X $1.50/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

gpt-oss 120B: Jalapeño versus MI355X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
Jalapeño versus MI355X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
Jalapeño:$0.006MI355X:$0.026
Jalapeño:$0.007MI355X:$0.040
Jalapeño:$0.007MI355X:$0.122
Concurrency
Jalapeño:~1132MI355X:~12
Jalapeño:~662MI355X:~5
Jalapeño:~416MI355X:~15