gpt-oss 120B · Performance per Dollar

gpt-oss 120B — H100 vs Jalapeño Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) versus Jalapeño (OpenAI Jalapeño) on gpt-oss 120B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Near the low end of the 98–250 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 135 tok/s/user — H100 runs $0.07 per million tokens on gpt-oss 120B while Jalapeño runs $0.01. Jalapeño is the cheaper choice by 1102%.

On gpt-oss 120B at 174 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.10 for H100 and $0.01 for Jalapeño; Jalapeño delivers 1455% more total tokens per dollar.

At 212 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B, H100 costs $0.14 per million tokens; Jalapeño costs $0.01. Jalapeño is 2038% more cost-efficient at this operating point. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): H100 $1.17/chip/hr · Jalapeño $1.27/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

gpt-oss 120B: H100 versus Jalapeño cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
H100 versus Jalapeño cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
H100:$0.074Jalapeño:$0.006
H100:$0.100Jalapeño:$0.006
H100:$0.145Jalapeño:$0.007
Concurrency
H100:~15Jalapeño:~1349
H100:~9Jalapeño:~845
H100:~4Jalapeño:~607