gpt-oss 120B · Performance per Dollar

gpt-oss 120B — B200 vs Jalapeño Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus Jalapeño (OpenAI Jalapeño) on gpt-oss 120B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

On gpt-oss 120B at 177 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.02 for B200 and $0.01 for Jalapeño; Jalapeño delivers 279% more total tokens per dollar.

At 258 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B, B200 costs $0.04 per million tokens; Jalapeño costs $0.01. Jalapeño is 420% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

Jalapeño edges B200 at 338 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B — $0.01 per million tokens versus $0.08, a 738% cost-per-token gap. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.73/chip/hr · Jalapeño $1.27/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

gpt-oss 120B: B200 versus Jalapeño cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus Jalapeño cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.024Jalapeño:$0.006
B200:$0.039Jalapeño:$0.007
B200:$0.084Jalapeño:$0.010
Concurrency
B200:~28Jalapeño:~820
B200:~5Jalapeño:~397
B200:~8Jalapeño:~181