GLM 5.3 744B · Performance per Dollar

GLM 5.3 744B — B300 vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on GLM 5.3 744B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

B300: $0.03 per million tokens. MI355X: $0.02. Both at 83 tok/s/user on GLM 5.3 744B, with MI355X 38% cheaper.

Around the middle of the 20–273 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 146 tok/s/user — B300 runs $0.06 per million tokens on GLM 5.3 744B while MI355X runs $0.05. MI355X is the cheaper choice by 27%.

On GLM 5.3 744B at 210 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.10 for B300 and $0.10 for MI355X; MI355X delivers 7% more total tokens per dollar. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): B300 $2.26/chip/hr · MI355X $1.50/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

GLM 5.3 744B: B300 versus MI355X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B300 versus MI355X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B300:$0.034MI355X:$0.025
B300:$0.060MI355X:$0.047
B300:$0.103MI355X:$0.097
Concurrency
B300:~24MI355X:~11
B300:~14MI355X:~4
B300:~7MI355X:~4

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config

GLM5.2/GLM5.3 744B 8K / 1K Cost per Million Total Tokens vs. Interactivity

Cost Tier:
Source:
SemiAnalysis InferenceX™

TCO $/chip/hr:

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.

Shift+Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Double-click to reset • Click a point to pin tooltip