GLM 5/5.1 · Performance per Dollar

GLM 5/5.1 — B200 vs H200 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) on GLM 5/5.1. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B200 $1.19 and H200 $1.19 per million tokens at 41 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1: effectively the same cost.

On GLM 5/5.1 at 61 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $1.57 for B200 and $1.85 for H200; B200 delivers 18% more output per dollar.

At 82 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1, B200 costs $2.62 per million tokens; H200 costs $2.93. B200 is 12% more cost-efficient at this operating point. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · H200 $1.41/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

GLM 5/5.1: B200 versus H200 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus H200 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$1.188H200:$1.190
B200:$1.569H200:$1.847
B200:$2.623H200:$2.933
Concurrency
B200:~473H200:~34
B200:~22H200:~14
B200:~11H200:~7

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.