DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T · Performance per Dollar

DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T — B200 vs GB200 NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Push DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T to 64 tok/s/user and B200 lands at $0.07 per million tokens against GB200 NVL72's $0.06 — GB200 NVL72 pulls ahead by 25%.

B200: $0.25 per million tokens. GB200 NVL72: $0.09. Both at 111 tok/s/user on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T, with GB200 NVL72 195% cheaper.

Toward the upper edge of the 18–203 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 157 tok/s/user — B200 runs $0.78 per million tokens on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T while GB200 NVL72 runs $0.99. B200 is the cheaper choice by 27%. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.73/chip/hr · GB200 NVL72 $1.86/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T: B200 versus GB200 NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus GB200 NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.071GB200 NVL72:$0.057
B200:$0.252GB200 NVL72:$0.085
B200:$0.778GB200 NVL72:$0.989
Concurrency
B200:~558GB200 NVL72:~9943
B200:~166GB200 NVL72:~1815
B200:~7GB200 NVL72:~41

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Cost per Million Total Tokens (Owning - Hyperscaler) vs. Interactivity

DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T FP4 8K / 1K Source: SemiAnalysis InferenceX™

TCO $/chip/hr: H100: 1.17H200: 1.22B200: 1.73B300: 2.26GB200: 1.86GB300: 2.31MI300X: 0.95MI325X: 1.1MI355X: 1.5RTX6000PRO: 0.68

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

Please change the model, sequence, precision, date range or chip selection.

Shift+Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Double-click to reset • Click a point to pin tooltip