DeepSeek R1 · Performance per Dollar

DeepSeek R1 — MI300X vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on DeepSeek R1. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

On DeepSeek R1 at 36 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $1.16 for MI300X and $0.23 for MI355X; MI355X delivers 413% more output per dollar.

At 47 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1, MI300X costs $1.66 per million tokens; MI355X costs $0.30. MI355X is 449% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

MI355X edges MI300X at 58 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1 — $0.43 per million tokens versus $2.74, a 530% cost-per-token gap. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): MI300X $1.12/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

DeepSeek R1: MI300X versus MI355X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
MI300X versus MI355X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
MI300X:$1.163MI355X:$0.227
MI300X:$1.663MI355X:$0.303
MI300X:$2.737MI355X:$0.435
Concurrency
MI300X:~31MI355X:~887
MI300X:~17MI355X:~421
MI300X:~8MI355X:~214

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.