DeepSeek R1 · Performance per Dollar

DeepSeek R1 — H100 vs Vera Rubin NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) versus Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on DeepSeek R1. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Only H100 has cost data at 45 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1 — $0.44 per million tokens. Vera Rubin NVL72 is unmeasured at this target.

H100 costs $1.16 per million tokens at 71 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1; we have no Vera Rubin NVL72 benchmark data at this exact target.

At 97 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1, H100 comes in at $2.11 per million tokens. Vera Rubin NVL72 hasn't been benchmarked at this operating point. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): H100 $1.17/chip/hr · Vera Rubin NVL72 $3.61/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

DeepSeek R1: H100 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
H100 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
H100:$0.439Vera Rubin NVL72:—
H100:$1.158Vera Rubin NVL72:—
H100:$2.106Vera Rubin NVL72:—
Concurrency
H100:~132Vera Rubin NVL72:—
H100:~41Vera Rubin NVL72:—
H100:~17Vera Rubin NVL72:—