DeepSeek R1 · Performance per Dollar

DeepSeek R1 — B200 vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on DeepSeek R1. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Push DeepSeek R1 to 60 tok/s/user and B200 lands at $0.19 per million tokens against MI355X's $0.22 — B200 pulls ahead by 16%.

B200: $0.42 per million tokens. MI355X: $0.40. Both at 108 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1, with MI355X 6% cheaper.

Toward the upper edge of the 12–204 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 156 tok/s/user — B200 runs $0.72 per million tokens on DeepSeek R1 while MI355X runs $0.55. MI355X is the cheaper choice by 31%. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

DeepSeek R1: B200 versus MI355X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus MI355X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.186MI355X:$0.216
B200:$0.422MI355X:$0.399
B200:$0.717MI355X:$0.545
Concurrency
B200:~280MI355X:~35
B200:~71MI355X:~27
B200:~60MI355X:~4

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.