Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B · Chip comparison
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B — H100 vs TPU7x
Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) and TPU7x (Google Ironwood) on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.
AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →
H100 / TPU7x on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B at 87 tok/s/user: 4,935 / 34,903 tok/s/chip, $0.066 / $0.008 per million tokens. TPU7x is 88% cheaper per token; TPU7x delivers 7.1× the tok/s/chip.
Around the middle of the 70–139 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 105 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B: H100 runs 4,912 tok/s/chip at $0.066 per million tokens, TPU7x runs 31,274 at $0.009. TPU7x is 86% cheaper per token; TPU7x delivers 6.4× the tok/s/chip.
Setting 122 tok/s/user as the target on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, H100 produces 4,879 tok/s/chip ($0.067 per million tokens) and TPU7x produces 28,027 ($0.010). TPU7x is 85% cheaper per token; TPU7x delivers 5.7× the tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
| Metric | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (tok/s/chip) | H1004,935TPU7x34,903 | H1004,912TPU7x31,274 | H1004,879TPU7x28,027 |
| Cost ($/M tok) | H100$0.066TPU7x$0.008 | H100$0.066TPU7x$0.009 | H100$0.067TPU7x$0.010 |
| tok/s/MW | H1003,601,887TPU7x28,917,042 | H1003,585,695TPU7x25,910,889 | H1003,561,415TPU7x23,220,337 |
| Concurrency | H100~10TPU7x~28 | H100~9TPU7x~23 | H100~9TPU7x~20 |