InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardComparisonsArticlesAbout
Star1,818δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source agentic inference benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

MiniMax M3 428B Β· Chip comparison

MiniMax M3 428B β€” GB300 NVL72 vs Vera Rubin NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on MiniMax M3 428B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

Throughput at 159 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B: GB300 NVL72 hits 32568 tok/s/chip, Vera Rubin NVL72 hits 110607. Per-million costs land at $0.02 and $0.01 respectively. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 117% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 240% more tok/s/chip.

GB300 NVL72 / Vera Rubin NVL72 on MiniMax M3 428B at 218 tok/s/user: 21832 / 82992 tok/s/chip, $0.03 / $0.01 per million tokens. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 143% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 280% more tok/s/chip.

Toward the upper edge of the 100–336 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 277 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B: GB300 NVL72 runs 13103 tok/s/chip at $0.05/M tokens, Vera Rubin NVL72 runs 61330 at $0.02/M. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 199% cheaper per token; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 368% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
GB300 NVL72:32567.6Vera Rubin NVL72:110606.8
GB300 NVL72:21832.5Vera Rubin NVL72:82991.8
GB300 NVL72:13103.4Vera Rubin NVL72:61330.5
Cost ($/M tok)
GB300 NVL72:$0.020Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.009
GB300 NVL72:$0.029Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.012
GB300 NVL72:$0.049Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.016
tok/s/MW
GB300 NVL72:15362054Vera Rubin NVL72:33517198
GB300 NVL72:10298334Vera Rubin NVL72:25149042
GB300 NVL72:6180856Vera Rubin NVL72:18584998
Concurrency
GB300 NVL72:~29Vera Rubin NVL72:~38
GB300 NVL72:~20Vera Rubin NVL72:~23
GB300 NVL72:~24Vera Rubin NVL72:~22

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K (deprecated)
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

MiniMax M3 428B 8K / 1K Total Tokens per $1 TCO vs. Interactivity

Cost Tier:
Owning at Large Hyperscaler Volume
Source:
SemiAnalysis InferenceXβ„’

TCO $/chip/hr: 3.61 1.17 1.22 1.73 2.26 1.86 2.31 0.95 1.1 1.5 0.68 1.27 1.03

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.

Shift+Scroll to zoom β€’ Drag to pan β€’ Double-click to reset β€’ Click a point to pin tooltip