MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 · GPU comparison

MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — B300 vs H100

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B300 / H100 on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 at 59 tok/s/user: 3463 / 614 tok/s/GPU, $0.19 / $0.58 per million tokens. B300 is 210% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 464% more tok/s/GPU.

Around the middle of the 40–117 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 78 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7: B300 runs 1568 tok/s/GPU at $0.42/M tokens, H100 runs 378 at $0.94/M. B300 is 122% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 315% more tok/s/GPU.

Setting 98 tok/s/user as the target on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7, B300 produces 1067 tok/s/GPU ($0.59 per million tokens) and H100 produces 199 ($1.82). B300 is 209% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 435% more tok/s/GPU. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
B300:3462.7H100:614.1
B300:1568.3H100:378.2
B300:1066.6H100:199.2
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.187H100:$0.580
B300:$0.421H100:$0.937
B300:$0.590H100:$1.824
tok/s/MW
B300:1595712H100:354968
B300:722720H100:218629
B300:491505H100:115163
Concurrency
B300:~157H100:~42
B300:~47H100:~12
B300:~22H100:~8

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.