Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T · GPU comparison

Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T — GB200 NVL72 vs MI325X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI325X (AMD CDNA 3) on Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

GB200 NVL72: 1855 tok/s/GPU, $0.33 per million tokens at 60 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T. MI325X is unmeasured here.

At 103 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T, GB200 NVL72 delivers 584 tok/s/GPU at $1.18 per million tokens; MI325X hasn't been benchmarked at this target.

GB200 NVL72 hits 133 tok/s/GPU for $4.69 per million tokens at 146 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T. No MI325X data at this operating point. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
GB200 NVL72:1854.8MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:584.3MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:133.2MI325X:
Cost ($/M tok)
GB200 NVL72:$0.328MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:$1.180MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:$4.687MI325X:
tok/s/MW
GB200 NVL72:883236MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:278250MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:63416MI325X:
Concurrency
GB200 NVL72:~667MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:~116MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:~13MI325X:

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.