GPU comparison
H200 vs MI300X
Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) and MI300X (AMD CDNA 3). Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch models, sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
| Metric | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (tok/s/gpu) | H200:2315.7MI300X:176.4 | H200:2315.7MI300X:137.3 | H200:1992.5MI300X:97.2 |
| Cost ($/M tok) | H200:$0.169MI300X:$1.752 | H200:$0.169MI300X:$2.217 | H200:$0.194MI300X:$3.201 |
| tok/s/MW | H200:1338561MI300X:98566 | H200:1338561MI300X:76686 | H200:1151755MI300X:54314 |
| Concurrency | H200:~1024MI300X:~30 | H200:~1024MI300X:~18 | H200:~1024MI300X:~11 |
Inference Performance
Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.