InferenceXbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardComparisonsArticlesAbout
Star1,671中文
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source agentic inference benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryArticlesAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

GLM 5.3 744B · Chip comparison

GLM 5.3 744B — B200 vs MI355X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on GLM 5.3 744B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

Setting 126 tok/s/user as the target on GLM 5.3 744B, B200 produces 9273 tok/s/chip ($0.05 per million tokens) and MI355X produces 4897 ($0.09). B200 is 64% cheaper per token; B200 delivers 89% more tok/s/chip.

At 156 tok/s/user interactivity on GLM 5.3 744B, B200 delivers 7846 tok/s/chip at $0.06 per million tokens; MI355X delivers 3733 tok/s/chip at $0.11. B200 is 82% cheaper per token; B200 delivers 110% more tok/s/chip at this point.

B200 posts 7223 tok/s/chip for $0.07 per million tokens at 186 tok/s/user on GLM 5.3 744B; MI355X posts 2683 tok/s/chip for $0.16. B200 is 133% cheaper per token; B200 delivers 169% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B200:9273.2MI355X:4897.4
B200:7846.0MI355X:3732.6
B200:7223.2MI355X:2683.0
Cost ($/M tok)
B200:$0.052MI355X:$0.085
B200:$0.061MI355X:$0.112
B200:$0.067MI355X:$0.155
tok/s/MW
B200:5422909MI355X:2343233
B200:4588323MI355X:1785921
B200:4224079MI355X:1283708
Concurrency
B200:~14MI355X:~3
B200:~11MI355X:~2
B200:~9MI355X:~4

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.