InferenceXbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardComparisonsArticlesAbout
Star1,676中文
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source agentic inference benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryArticlesAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

GLM 5.3 744B · Chip comparison

GLM 5.3 744B — B200 vs B300

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on GLM 5.3 744B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

B200 posts 8504 tok/s/chip for $0.06 per million tokens at 140 tok/s/user on GLM 5.3 744B; B300 posts 11225 tok/s/chip for $0.06. B300 is 1% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 32% more tok/s/chip.

Throughput at 184 tok/s/user on GLM 5.3 744B: B200 hits 7266 tok/s/chip, B300 hits 7231. Per-million costs land at $0.07 and $0.09 respectively. B200 is 31% cheaper per token; throughput per chip is essentially tied.

B200 / B300 on GLM 5.3 744B at 229 tok/s/user: 5408 / 5154 tok/s/chip, $0.09 / $0.12 per million tokens. B200 is 37% cheaper per token; B200 delivers 5% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B200:8503.5B300:11224.9
B200:7265.6B300:7230.8
B200:5408.2B300:5154.3
Cost ($/M tok)
B200:$0.057B300:$0.056
B200:$0.066B300:$0.087
B200:$0.089B300:$0.122
tok/s/MW
B200:4972815B300:5907853
B200:4248869B300:3805696
B200:3162710B300:2712782
Concurrency
B200:~13B300:~15
B200:~9B300:~9
B200:~6B300:~6

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.