GLM 5/5.1 · GPU comparison

GLM 5/5.1 — GB300 NVL72 vs H200

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) on GLM 5/5.1. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

H200 hits 329 tok/s/GPU for $1.19 per million tokens at 41 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1. No GB300 NVL72 data at this operating point.

H200: 212 tok/s/GPU, $1.85 per million tokens at 61 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1. GB300 NVL72 is unmeasured here.

At 82 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1, H200 delivers 132 tok/s/GPU at $2.93 per million tokens; GB300 NVL72 hasn't been benchmarked at this target. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
GB300 NVL72:H200:329.5
GB300 NVL72:H200:212.5
GB300 NVL72:H200:132.4
Cost ($/M tok)
GB300 NVL72:H200:$1.190
GB300 NVL72:H200:$1.847
GB300 NVL72:H200:$2.933
tok/s/MW
GB300 NVL72:H200:190452
GB300 NVL72:H200:122811
GB300 NVL72:H200:76544
Concurrency
GB300 NVL72:H200:~34
GB300 NVL72:H200:~14
GB300 NVL72:H200:~7

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.