GLM 5/5.1 — GB200 NVL72 vs MI355X
Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on GLM 5/5.1. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.
Throughput at 36 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1: GB200 NVL72 hits 10443 tok/s/GPU, MI355X hits 1218. Per-million costs land at $0.06 and $0.34 respectively. GB200 NVL72 is 474% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 757% more tok/s/GPU.
GB200 NVL72 / MI355X on GLM 5/5.1 at 43 tok/s/user: 10265 / 949 tok/s/GPU, $0.06 / $0.43 per million tokens. GB200 NVL72 is 627% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 982% more tok/s/GPU.
Toward the upper edge of the 30–56 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 50 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1: GB200 NVL72 runs 9984 tok/s/GPU at $0.06/M tokens, MI355X runs 670 at $0.63/M. GB200 NVL72 is 920% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 1390% more tok/s/GPU. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)
| Metric | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (tok/s/gpu) | GB200 NVL72:10442.9MI355X:1218.0 | GB200 NVL72:10265.2MI355X:948.6 | GB200 NVL72:9983.9MI355X:670.1 |
| Cost ($/M tok) | GB200 NVL72:$0.059MI355X:$0.338 | GB200 NVL72:$0.060MI355X:$0.434 | GB200 NVL72:$0.061MI355X:$0.627 |
| tok/s/MW | GB200 NVL72:5584446MI355X:582775 | GB200 NVL72:5489410MI355X:453886 | GB200 NVL72:5338994MI355X:320643 |
| Concurrency | GB200 NVL72:~2253MI355X:~8 | GB200 NVL72:~1843MI355X:~8 | GB200 NVL72:~1340MI355X:~7 |
Inference Performance
Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.