GLM 5/5.1 — B200 vs GB200 NVL72
Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on GLM 5/5.1. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.
B200 posts 2532 tok/s/GPU for $0.21 per million tokens at 58 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1; GB200 NVL72 posts 9598 tok/s/GPU for $0.06. GB200 NVL72 is 234% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 279% more tok/s/GPU.
Throughput at 86 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1: B200 hits 1796 tok/s/GPU, GB200 NVL72 hits 6589. Per-million costs land at $0.30 and $0.09 respectively. GB200 NVL72 is 227% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 267% more tok/s/GPU.
B200 / GB200 NVL72 on GLM 5/5.1 at 114 tok/s/user: 1385 / 1997 tok/s/GPU, $0.39 / $0.31 per million tokens. GB200 NVL72 is 27% cheaper per token; GB200 NVL72 delivers 44% more tok/s/GPU. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)
| Metric | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput (tok/s/gpu) | B200:2531.9GB200 NVL72:9597.8 | B200:1796.4GB200 NVL72:6589.1 | B200:1385.1GB200 NVL72:1996.6 |
| Cost ($/M tok) | B200:$0.214GB200 NVL72:$0.064 | B200:$0.303GB200 NVL72:$0.093 | B200:$0.393GB200 NVL72:$0.309 |
| tok/s/MW | B200:1480645GB200 NVL72:5132497 | B200:1050524GB200 NVL72:3523588 | B200:809988GB200 NVL72:1067709 |
| Concurrency | B200:~20GB200 NVL72:~953 | B200:~10GB200 NVL72:~664 | B200:~5GB200 NVL72:~108 |
Inference Performance
Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.