DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T · GPU comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T — MI300X vs MI355X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) and MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

MI355X: 2861 tok/s/GPU, $0.14 per million tokens at 32 tok/s/user on DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T. MI300X is unmeasured here.

At 61 tok/s/user on DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T, MI355X delivers 1089 tok/s/GPU at $0.38 per million tokens; MI300X hasn't been benchmarked at this target.

MI355X hits 601 tok/s/GPU for $0.70 per million tokens at 91 tok/s/user on DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T. No MI300X data at this operating point. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
MI300X:MI355X:2860.6
MI300X:MI355X:1088.9
MI300X:MI355X:601.3
Cost ($/M tok)
MI300X:MI355X:$0.145
MI300X:MI355X:$0.376
MI300X:MI355X:$0.699
tok/s/MW
MI300X:MI355X:1368719
MI300X:MI355X:520981
MI300X:MI355X:287699
Concurrency
MI300X:MI355X:~101
MI300X:MI355X:~17
MI300X:MI355X:~7

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: