DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T · Chip comparison

DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T — B200 vs B300

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX

At 60 tok/s/user interactivity on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T, B200 delivers 12637 tok/s/chip at $0.04 per million tokens; B300 delivers 18420 tok/s/chip at $0.03. B300 is 12% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 46% more tok/s/chip at this point.

B200 posts 6418 tok/s/chip for $0.07 per million tokens at 101 tok/s/user on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T; B300 posts 10372 tok/s/chip for $0.06. B300 is 24% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 62% more tok/s/chip.

Throughput at 141 tok/s/user on DeepSeekv4 Pro 0813 1.6T: B200 hits 3129 tok/s/chip, B300 hits 5758. Per-million costs land at $0.15 and $0.11 respectively. B300 is 41% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 84% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B200:12637.1B300:18420.1
B200:6417.5B300:10372.3
B200:3128.7B300:5757.9
Cost ($/M tok)
B200:$0.038B300:$0.034
B200:$0.075B300:$0.061
B200:$0.154B300:$0.109
tok/s/MW
B200:7390127B300:9694804
B200:3752926B300:5459124
B200:1829651B300:3030469
Concurrency
B200:~20B300:~16
B200:~9B300:~8
B200:~4B300:~4

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Total Tokens per $1 USD (Owning - Hyperscaler) vs. Interactivity

DeepSeek V4 Pro 1.6T FP4 8K / 1K Source: SemiAnalysis InferenceX™

TCO $/chip/hr: H100: 1.17H200: 1.22B200: 1.73B300: 2.26GB200: 1.86GB300: 2.31MI300X: 0.95MI325X: 1.1MI355X: 1.5RTX6000PRO: 0.68

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

Please change the model, sequence, precision, date range or chip selection.

Shift+Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Double-click to reset • Click a point to pin tooltip