Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · Speculative Decoding

B200 FP4: MTP vs Off Speculative Decoding

Speculative decoding comparison of MTP versus Off on B200 FP4 (NVIDIA Blackwell) running Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Throughput, cost, and interactivity differences across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

MTP acceptance-rate comparability

MTP acceptance-rate implementations differ across inference engines. Points from different engines are not directly comparable on the same curve — throughput and cost at matched interactivity may reflect engine-level differences rather than pure speculative decoding gains. Interpret cross-engine comparisons with caution.

Throughput at 77 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B (B200 FP4): MTP hits 7266 tok/s/GPU, Off hits 2670. Per-million costs land at $0.07 and $0.20 respectively. MTP is 165% cheaper per token; MTP delivers 172% more tok/s/GPU. Speculative decoding trades extra compute on draft tokens for fewer decoding steps — the payoff depends on sequence length and batch size.

Around the middle of the 41–186 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 114 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B (B200 FP4): MTP runs 4613 tok/s/GPU at $0.12/M tokens, Off runs 998 at $0.54/M. MTP is 364% cheaper per token; MTP delivers 362% more tok/s/GPU. Gains from speculative decoding vary by workload; short-output prompts tend to benefit less.

At 150 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B (B200 FP4), MTP delivers 2640 tok/s/GPU at $0.20 per million tokens; Off delivers 515 tok/s/GPU at $1.05. MTP is 416% cheaper per token; MTP delivers 412% more tok/s/GPU. Speculative decoding accepts draft tokens to reduce per-token latency — gains vary by workload and prompt distribution. (Numbers reflect this URL's pinned 1k/1k · fp4 workload — changing sequence or model updates both the table and chart; the table stays pinned to this page's precision, so precision toggles in the controls affect the chart only.)

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B: B200 FP4 MTP versus Off speculative decoding comparison at matched interactivity levels
B200 FP4 MTP versus Off speculative decoding comparison for this page's canonical default workload.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
MTP:7265.5Off:2670.4
MTP:4613.1Off:998.3
MTP:2639.9Off:515.3
Cost ($/M tok)
MTP:$0.075Off:$0.199
MTP:$0.116Off:$0.537
MTP:$0.204Off:$1.053
tok/s/MW
MTP:3348176Off:1230587
MTP:2125852Off:460036
MTP:1216561Off:237461
Concurrency
MTP:~406Off:~67
MTP:~191Off:~26
MTP:~92Off:~8

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: