Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B · Performance per Dollar

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B — B300 vs Vera Rubin NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

On Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B at 71 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.01 for B300 and $0.00 for Vera Rubin NVL72; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 70% more total tokens per dollar.

At 104 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, B300 costs $0.01 per million tokens; Vera Rubin NVL72 costs $0.00. Vera Rubin NVL72 is 87% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

Vera Rubin NVL72 edges B300 at 137 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B — $0.01 per million tokens versus $0.01, a 120% cost-per-token gap. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): B300 $2.26/chip/hr · Vera Rubin NVL72 $3.61/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B: B300 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B300 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B300:$0.008Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.005
B300:$0.009Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.005
B300:$0.012Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.005
Concurrency
B300:~16Vera Rubin NVL72:~216
B300:~13Vera Rubin NVL72:~272
B300:~10Vera Rubin NVL72:~286

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.