Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B · Performance per dollar

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B — B200 vs TPU7x performance per dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus TPU7x (Google Ironwood) on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

At 148 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, TPU7x comes in at $0.012 per million tokens. B200 hasn't been benchmarked at this operating point.

Only TPU7x has cost data at 226 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B — $0.020 per million tokens. B200 is unmeasured at this target.

TPU7x costs $0.033 per million tokens at 304 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B; we have no B200 benchmark data at this exact target. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.73/chip/hr · TPU7x $1.03/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency and throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.

Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollars per million tokens
B200—TPU7x$0.012
B200—TPU7x$0.020
B200—TPU7x$0.033
Concurrency
B200—TPU7x~15
B200—TPU7x~10
B200—TPU7x~6
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B: B200 versus TPU7x cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus TPU7x cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Open full-size image ↗