Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · Performance per Dollar

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — RTX PRO 6000 vs TPU7x Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of RTX PRO 6000 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus TPU7x (Google Ironwood) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

TPU7x costs $0.01 per million tokens at 201 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B; we have no RTX PRO 6000 benchmark data at this exact target.

At 320 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B, TPU7x comes in at $0.01 per million tokens. RTX PRO 6000 hasn't been benchmarked at this operating point.

Only TPU7x has cost data at 439 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — $0.02 per million tokens. RTX PRO 6000 is unmeasured at this target. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): RTX PRO 6000 $0.68/chip/hr · TPU7x $1.03/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B: RTX PRO 6000 versus TPU7x cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
RTX PRO 6000 versus TPU7x cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
RTX PRO 6000:—TPU7x:$0.008
RTX PRO 6000:—TPU7x:$0.012
RTX PRO 6000:—TPU7x:$0.018
Concurrency
RTX PRO 6000:—TPU7x:~22
RTX PRO 6000:—TPU7x:~15
RTX PRO 6000:—TPU7x:~10

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config

Qwen3.5 397B 8K / 1K Cost per Million Total Tokens vs. Interactivity

Cost Tier:
Source:
SemiAnalysis InferenceX™

TCO $/chip/hr:

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

Matching measurements exist, but their chip series are hidden.

Shift+Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Double-click to reset • Click a point to pin tooltip