Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · Performance per Dollar

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — MI300X vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Push Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B to 43 tok/s/user and MI300X lands at $0.89 per million tokens against MI355X's $0.15 — MI355X pulls ahead by 510%.

MI300X: $1.63 per million tokens. MI355X: $0.17. Both at 53 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B, with MI355X 880% cheaper.

Toward the upper edge of the 34–71 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 62 tok/s/user — MI300X runs $2.52 per million tokens on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B while MI355X runs $0.19. MI355X is the cheaper choice by 1245%. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): MI300X $1.12/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
MI300X:$0.893MI355X:$0.146
MI300X:$1.633MI355X:$0.167
MI300X:$2.517MI355X:$0.187
Concurrency
MI300X:~34MI355X:~132
MI300X:~15MI355X:~90
MI300X:~8MI355X:~71

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.