MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B · Performance per dollar

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B — GB200 NVL72 vs Vera Rubin NVL72 performance per dollar

Cost per million tokens of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

Vera Rubin NVL72 edges GB200 NVL72 at 444 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B — $0.006 per million tokens versus $0.035, a 81% lower cost per token.

Push MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B to 513 tok/s/user and GB200 NVL72 lands at $0.056 per million tokens against Vera Rubin NVL72's $0.012 — Vera Rubin NVL72 costs 79% less.

GB200 NVL72: $0.064 per million tokens. Vera Rubin NVL72: $0.015. Both at 581 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B, with Vera Rubin NVL72 77% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): GB200 NVL72 $1.86/chip/hr · Vera Rubin NVL72 $3.61/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency and throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.

Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollars per million tokens
GB200 NVL72$0.035Vera Rubin NVL72$0.006
GB200 NVL72$0.056Vera Rubin NVL72$0.012
GB200 NVL72$0.064Vera Rubin NVL72$0.015
Concurrency
GB200 NVL72~7Vera Rubin NVL72~204
GB200 NVL72~3Vera Rubin NVL72~124
GB200 NVL72~2Vera Rubin NVL72~77
MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B: GB200 NVL72 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
GB200 NVL72 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Open full-size image ↗