MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B · Performance per Dollar

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B — GB200 NVL72 vs H200 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) on MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

Push MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B to 81 tok/s/user and GB200 NVL72 lands at $0.01 per million tokens against H200's $0.03 — GB200 NVL72 pulls ahead by 251%.

GB200 NVL72: $0.01 per million tokens. H200: $0.05. Both at 152 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B, with GB200 NVL72 300% cheaper.

Toward the upper edge of the 10–294 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 223 tok/s/user — GB200 NVL72 runs $0.02 per million tokens on MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B while H200 runs $0.08. GB200 NVL72 is the cheaper choice by 336%. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): GB200 NVL72 $1.86/chip/hr · H200 $1.22/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B: GB200 NVL72 versus H200 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
GB200 NVL72 versus H200 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
GB200 NVL72:$0.010H200:$0.034
GB200 NVL72:$0.012H200:$0.048
GB200 NVL72:$0.018H200:$0.080
Concurrency
GB200 NVL72:~32H200:~16
GB200 NVL72:~26H200:~10
GB200 NVL72:~16H200:~5

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.