MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B · Performance per Dollar

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B — GB200 NVL72 vs GB300 NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

At 140 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B, GB200 NVL72 and GB300 NVL72 land within ~1% on cost per million tokens ($0.01 vs $0.01) — call it a tie at this operating point.

Around the middle of the 10–529 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 269 tok/s/user — GB200 NVL72 runs $0.02 per million tokens on MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B while GB300 NVL72 runs $0.03. GB200 NVL72 is the cheaper choice by 21%.

On MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B at 399 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.04 for GB200 NVL72 and $0.05 for GB300 NVL72; GB200 NVL72 delivers 14% more total tokens per dollar. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): GB200 NVL72 $1.86/chip/hr · GB300 NVL72 $2.31/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

MiniMax M3.1 Flash 428B: GB200 NVL72 versus GB300 NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
GB200 NVL72 versus GB300 NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
GB200 NVL72:$0.011GB300 NVL72:$0.011
GB200 NVL72:$0.024GB300 NVL72:$0.029
GB200 NVL72:$0.045GB300 NVL72:$0.051
Concurrency
GB200 NVL72:~28GB300 NVL72:~32
GB200 NVL72:~12GB300 NVL72:~12
GB200 NVL72:~6GB300 NVL72:~6

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.