MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 · Performance per Dollar

MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — B200 vs H200 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

At 60 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7, B200 costs $0.17 per million tokens; H200 costs $0.43. B200 is 157% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

B200 edges H200 at 82 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — $0.36 per million tokens versus $0.95, a 161% cost-per-token gap.

Push MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 to 104 tok/s/user and B200 lands at $0.58 per million tokens against H200's $1.72 — B200 pulls ahead by 198%. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · H200 $1.41/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.167H200:$0.430
B200:$0.362H200:$0.945
B200:$0.580H200:$1.725
Concurrency
B200:~110H200:~62
B200:~38H200:~20
B200:~18H200:~9

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.