MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 · Performance per Dollar

MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — B200 vs B300 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B200 edges B300 at 66 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 — $0.06 per million tokens versus $0.09, a 40% cost-per-token gap.

Push MiniMax M2.5/M2.7 to 110 tok/s/user and B200 lands at $0.20 per million tokens against B300's $0.25 — B200 pulls ahead by 26%.

B200: $0.71 per million tokens. B300: $0.82. Both at 154 tok/s/user on MiniMax M2.5/M2.7, with B200 16% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · B300 $2.34/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

MiniMax M2.5/M2.7: B200 versus B300 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus B300 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.063B300:$0.088
B200:$0.198B300:$0.250
B200:$0.710B300:$0.821
Concurrency
B200:~1000B300:~524
B200:~128B300:~68
B200:~12B300:~14

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: