Llama 3.3 70B · Performance per Dollar

Llama 3.3 70B — H100 vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on Llama 3.3 70B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

At 53 tok/s/user on Llama 3.3 70B, H100 costs $0.25 per million tokens; MI355X costs $0.18. MI355X is 39% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

MI355X edges H100 at 72 tok/s/user on Llama 3.3 70B — $0.25 per million tokens versus $0.45, a 84% cost-per-token gap.

Push Llama 3.3 70B to 91 tok/s/user and H100 lands at $1.19 per million tokens against MI355X's $0.42 — MI355X pulls ahead by 182%. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): H100 $1.30/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Llama 3.3 70B: H100 versus MI355X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
H100 versus MI355X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
H100:$0.249MI355X:$0.179
H100:$0.454MI355X:$0.247
H100:$1.194MI355X:$0.424
Concurrency
H100:~64MI355X:~47
H100:~50MI355X:~53
H100:~14MI355X:~22

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.