Llama 3.3 70B · Performance per Dollar

Llama 3.3 70B — H100 vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on Llama 3.3 70B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

At 53 tok/s/user on Llama 3.3 70B, H100 costs $0.25 per million tokens; MI355X costs $0.18. MI355X is 39% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

MI355X edges H100 at 72 tok/s/user on Llama 3.3 70B — $0.25 per million tokens versus $0.45, a 84% cost-per-token gap.

Push Llama 3.3 70B to 91 tok/s/user and H100 lands at $1.19 per million tokens against MI355X's $0.42 — MI355X pulls ahead by 182%. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): H100 $1.30/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
H100:$0.249MI355X:$0.179
H100:$0.454MI355X:$0.247
H100:$1.194MI355X:$0.424
Concurrency
H100:~64MI355X:~47
H100:~50MI355X:~53
H100:~14MI355X:~22

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.