Llama 3.3 70B · Performance per Dollar

Llama 3.3 70B — B200 vs MI300X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) on Llama 3.3 70B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B200 edges MI300X at 53 tok/s/user on Llama 3.3 70B — $0.08 per million tokens versus $0.26, a 208% cost-per-token gap.

Push Llama 3.3 70B to 73 tok/s/user and B200 lands at $0.12 per million tokens against MI300X's $0.48 — B200 pulls ahead by 312%.

B200: $0.15 per million tokens. MI300X: $0.83. Both at 93 tok/s/user on Llama 3.3 70B, with B200 444% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · MI300X $1.12/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.083MI300X:$0.257
B200:$0.116MI300X:$0.479
B200:$0.153MI300X:$0.832
Concurrency
B200:~128MI300X:~50
B200:~128MI300X:~32
B200:~86MI300X:~17

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.