Llama 3.3 70B · Performance per Dollar

Llama 3.3 70B — B200 vs MI300X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) on Llama 3.3 70B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B200 edges MI300X at 53 tok/s/user on Llama 3.3 70B — $0.08 per million tokens versus $0.26, a 208% cost-per-token gap.

Push Llama 3.3 70B to 73 tok/s/user and B200 lands at $0.12 per million tokens against MI300X's $0.48 — B200 pulls ahead by 312%.

B200: $0.15 per million tokens. MI300X: $0.83. Both at 93 tok/s/user on Llama 3.3 70B, with B200 444% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · MI300X $1.12/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Llama 3.3 70B: B200 versus MI300X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus MI300X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.083MI300X:$0.257
B200:$0.116MI300X:$0.479
B200:$0.153MI300X:$0.832
Concurrency
B200:~128MI300X:~50
B200:~128MI300X:~32
B200:~86MI300X:~17

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.