Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T · Performance per Dollar

Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T — MI300X vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

MI300X: $2.56 per million tokens. MI355X: $3.78. Both at 21 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T, with MI300X 48% cheaper.

Around the middle of the 14–43 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 28 tok/s/user — MI300X runs $2.83 per million tokens on Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T while MI355X runs $6.14. MI300X is the cheaper choice by 117%.

On Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T at 36 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $3.75 for MI300X and $8.46 for MI355X; MI300X delivers 126% more output per dollar. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · int4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): MI300X $1.12/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
MI300X:$2.557MI355X:$3.778
MI300X:$2.829MI355X:$6.139
MI300X:$3.748MI355X:$8.464
Concurrency
MI300X:~23MI355X:~23
MI300X:~16MI355X:~10
MI300X:~10MI355X:~6

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.