Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T · Performance per Dollar

Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T — MI300X vs MI325X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) versus MI325X (AMD CDNA 3) on Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

At 24 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T, MI300X costs $2.63 per million tokens; MI325X costs $2.50. MI325X is 5% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

MI325X edges MI300X at 32 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T — $2.72 per million tokens versus $3.22, a 18% cost-per-token gap.

Push Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T to 40 tok/s/user and MI300X lands at $4.44 per million tokens against MI325X's $4.03 — MI325X pulls ahead by 10%. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · int4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): MI300X $1.12/GPU/hr · MI325X $1.28/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Kimi K2.5/K2.6 1T: MI300X versus MI325X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
MI300X versus MI325X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
MI300X:$2.627MI325X:$2.495
MI300X:$3.224MI325X:$2.721
MI300X:$4.441MI325X:$4.028
Concurrency
MI300X:~20MI325X:~24
MI300X:~12MI325X:~17
MI300X:~7MI325X:~9

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.