gpt-oss 120B · Performance per Dollar

gpt-oss 120B — GB200 NVL72 vs H100 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) on gpt-oss 120B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

GB200 NVL72 edges H100 at 117 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B — $0.03 per million tokens versus $0.14, a 328% cost-per-token gap.

Push gpt-oss 120B to 166 tok/s/user and GB200 NVL72 lands at $0.04 per million tokens against H100's $0.26 — GB200 NVL72 pulls ahead by 591%.

GB200 NVL72: $0.07 per million tokens. H100: $0.49. Both at 216 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B, with GB200 NVL72 593% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): GB200 NVL72 $2.21/GPU/hr · H100 $1.30/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

gpt-oss 120B: GB200 NVL72 versus H100 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
GB200 NVL72 versus H100 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
GB200 NVL72:$0.032H100:$0.139
GB200 NVL72:$0.038H100:$0.262
GB200 NVL72:$0.070H100:$0.487
Concurrency
GB200 NVL72:~264H100:~64
GB200 NVL72:~2684H100:~17
GB200 NVL72:~102H100:~8

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.