gpt-oss 120B · Performance per Dollar

gpt-oss 120B — GB200 NVL72 vs H100 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) on gpt-oss 120B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

GB200 NVL72 edges H100 at 117 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B — $0.03 per million tokens versus $0.14, a 328% cost-per-token gap.

Push gpt-oss 120B to 166 tok/s/user and GB200 NVL72 lands at $0.04 per million tokens against H100's $0.26 — GB200 NVL72 pulls ahead by 591%.

GB200 NVL72: $0.07 per million tokens. H100: $0.49. Both at 216 tok/s/user on gpt-oss 120B, with GB200 NVL72 593% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): GB200 NVL72 $2.21/GPU/hr · H100 $1.30/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
GB200 NVL72:$0.032H100:$0.139
GB200 NVL72:$0.038H100:$0.262
GB200 NVL72:$0.070H100:$0.487
Concurrency
GB200 NVL72:~264H100:~64
GB200 NVL72:~2684H100:~17
GB200 NVL72:~102H100:~8

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.