GLM 5.3 744B · Performance per Dollar

GLM 5.3 744B — GB300 NVL72 vs Vera Rubin NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on GLM 5.3 744B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

Vera Rubin NVL72 edges GB300 NVL72 at 168 tok/s/user on GLM 5.3 744B — $0.01 per million tokens versus $0.05, a 250% cost-per-token gap.

Push GLM 5.3 744B to 224 tok/s/user and GB300 NVL72 lands at $0.06 per million tokens against Vera Rubin NVL72's $0.02 — Vera Rubin NVL72 pulls ahead by 188%.

GB300 NVL72: $0.19 per million tokens. Vera Rubin NVL72: $0.04. Both at 280 tok/s/user on GLM 5.3 744B, with Vera Rubin NVL72 388% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): GB300 NVL72 $2.31/chip/hr · Vera Rubin NVL72 $3.61/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

GLM 5.3 744B: GB300 NVL72 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
GB300 NVL72 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
GB300 NVL72:$0.045Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.013
GB300 NVL72:$0.064Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.022
GB300 NVL72:$0.188Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.038
Concurrency
GB300 NVL72:~60Vera Rubin NVL72:~265
GB300 NVL72:~28Vera Rubin NVL72:~122
GB300 NVL72:~3Vera Rubin NVL72:~50

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.