GLM 5.3 744B · Performance per Dollar

GLM 5.3 744B — B300 vs Vera Rubin NVL72 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus Vera Rubin NVL72 (NVIDIA Vera Rubin) on GLM 5.3 744B. Large-hyperscaler-volume ownership TCO normalized by total tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX →

B300: $0.06 per million tokens. Vera Rubin NVL72: $0.01. Both at 163 tok/s/user on GLM 5.3 744B, with Vera Rubin NVL72 359% cheaper.

Around the middle of the 112–319 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 215 tok/s/user — B300 runs $0.09 per million tokens on GLM 5.3 744B while Vera Rubin NVL72 runs $0.02. Vera Rubin NVL72 is the cheaper choice by 340%.

On GLM 5.3 744B at 267 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.13 for B300 and $0.03 for Vera Rubin NVL72; Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers 286% more total tokens per dollar. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): B300 $2.26/chip/hr · Vera Rubin NVL72 $3.61/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

GLM 5.3 744B: B300 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B300 versus Vera Rubin NVL72 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B300:$0.057Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.012
B300:$0.090Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.020
B300:$0.134Vera Rubin NVL72:$0.035
Concurrency
B300:~10Vera Rubin NVL72:~280
B300:~7Vera Rubin NVL72:~141
B300:~2Vera Rubin NVL72:~60

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.