GLM 5/5.1 · Performance per Dollar

GLM 5/5.1 — B200 vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on GLM 5/5.1. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

MI355X edges B200 at 34 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1 — $0.45 per million tokens versus $0.86, a 89% cost-per-token gap.

Push GLM 5/5.1 to 57 tok/s/user and B200 lands at $1.47 per million tokens against MI355X's $1.04 — MI355X pulls ahead by 42%.

B200: $2.48 per million tokens. MI355X: $1.65. Both at 80 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1, with MI355X 50% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.856MI355X:$0.453
B200:$1.466MI355X:$1.036
B200:$2.481MI355X:$1.650
Concurrency
B200:~198MI355X:~128
B200:~25MI355X:~14
B200:~11MI355X:~8

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.