GLM 5/5.1 · Performance per Dollar

GLM 5/5.1 — B200 vs MI355X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on GLM 5/5.1. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

MI355X edges B200 at 32 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1 — $0.30 per million tokens versus $0.31, a 1% cost-per-token gap.

Push GLM 5/5.1 to 51 tok/s/user and B200 lands at $0.42 per million tokens against MI355X's $0.43 — B200 pulls ahead by 2%.

B200: $0.54 per million tokens. MI355X: $0.57. Both at 71 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1, with B200 6% cheaper. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · MI355X $1.48/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

GLM 5/5.1: B200 versus MI355X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus MI355X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.309MI355X:$0.305
B200:$0.417MI355X:$0.427
B200:$0.542MI355X:$0.572
Concurrency
B200:~240MI355X:~19
B200:~23MI355X:~9
B200:~13MI355X:~4

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: