GLM 5/5.1 · Performance per Dollar

GLM 5/5.1 — B200 vs B300 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on GLM 5/5.1. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B200: $1.16 per million tokens. B300: $0.77. Both at 40 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1, with B300 50% cheaper.

Around the middle of the 17–108 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 63 tok/s/user — B200 runs $1.63 per million tokens on GLM 5/5.1 while B300 runs $1.15. B300 is the cheaper choice by 41%.

On GLM 5/5.1 at 86 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $2.93 for B200 and $1.69 for B300; B300 delivers 74% more output per dollar. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · B300 $2.34/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

GLM 5/5.1: B200 versus B300 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus B300 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$1.164B300:$0.774
B200:$1.627B300:$1.154
B200:$2.932B300:$1.688
Concurrency
B200:~499B300:~85
B200:~21B300:~37
B200:~9B300:~19

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.