GLM 5/5.1 · Performance per Dollar

GLM 5/5.1 — B200 vs B300 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on GLM 5/5.1. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B200: $0.33 per million tokens. B300: $0.51. Both at 37 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1, with B200 54% cheaper.

Around the middle of the 12–113 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 63 tok/s/user — B200 runs $0.48 per million tokens on GLM 5/5.1 while B300 runs $0.69. B200 is the cheaper choice by 43%.

On GLM 5/5.1 at 88 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.70 for B200 and $0.95 for B300; B200 delivers 37% more output per dollar. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · B300 $2.34/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

GLM 5/5.1: B200 versus B300 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus B300 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.332B300:$0.512
B200:$0.482B300:$0.691
B200:$0.696B300:$0.953
Concurrency
B200:~216B300:~32
B200:~17B300:~14
B200:~9B300:~8

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: