DeepSeek R1 · Performance per Dollar

DeepSeek R1 — H100 vs H200 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) versus H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) on DeepSeek R1. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

At 45 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1, H100 costs $0.56 per million tokens; H200 costs $0.22. H200 is 154% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

H200 edges H100 at 71 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1 — $0.43 per million tokens versus $1.37, a 221% cost-per-token gap.

Push DeepSeek R1 to 97 tok/s/user and H100 lands at $2.45 per million tokens against H200's $0.78 — H200 pulls ahead by 213%. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): H100 $1.30/GPU/hr · H200 $1.41/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

DeepSeek R1: H100 versus H200 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
H100 versus H200 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
H100:$0.557H200:$0.220
H100:$1.366H200:$0.426
H100:$2.453H200:$0.784
Concurrency
H100:~132H200:~115
H100:~41H200:~122
H100:~17H200:~4

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.