DeepSeek R1 · Performance per Dollar

DeepSeek R1 — H100 vs H200 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) versus H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) on DeepSeek R1. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

At 45 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1, H100 costs $0.56 per million tokens; H200 costs $0.22. H200 is 154% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

H200 edges H100 at 71 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1 — $0.43 per million tokens versus $1.37, a 221% cost-per-token gap.

Push DeepSeek R1 to 97 tok/s/user and H100 lands at $2.45 per million tokens against H200's $0.78 — H200 pulls ahead by 213%. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): H100 $1.30/GPU/hr · H200 $1.41/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
H100:$0.557H200:$0.220
H100:$1.366H200:$0.426
H100:$2.453H200:$0.784
Concurrency
H100:~132H200:~115
H100:~41H200:~122
H100:~17H200:~4

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.