DeepSeek R1 · Performance per Dollar

DeepSeek R1 — B200 vs MI325X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI325X (AMD CDNA 3) on DeepSeek R1. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

On DeepSeek R1 at 25 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.09 for B200 and $0.42 for MI325X; B200 delivers 350% more output per dollar.

At 35 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1, B200 costs $0.10 per million tokens; MI325X costs $0.52. B200 is 410% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

B200 edges MI325X at 44 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1 — $0.11 per million tokens versus $0.77, a 625% cost-per-token gap. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · MI325X $1.28/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

DeepSeek R1: B200 versus MI325X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus MI325X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.092MI325X:$0.416
B200:$0.101MI325X:$0.518
B200:$0.106MI325X:$0.769
Concurrency
B200:~1088MI325X:~33
B200:~892MI325X:~19
B200:~467MI325X:~10

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.