DeepSeek R1 · Performance per Dollar

DeepSeek R1 — B200 vs H100 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) on DeepSeek R1. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

At 42 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1, B200 costs $0.11 per million tokens; H100 costs $1.36. B200 is 1109% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

B200 edges H100 at 71 tok/s/user on DeepSeek R1 — $0.54 per million tokens versus $4.86, a 794% cost-per-token gap.

Push DeepSeek R1 to 100 tok/s/user and B200 lands at $1.09 per million tokens against H100's $15.7 — B200 pulls ahead by 1342%. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · H100 $1.30/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

DeepSeek R1: B200 versus H100 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus H100 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.113H100:$1.365
B200:$0.544H100:$4.864
B200:$1.088H100:$15.692
Concurrency
B200:~1577H100:~558
B200:~59H100:~52
B200:~139H100:~8

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.